Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Staggered wheels

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Staggered wheels

    Well I have a little discussion going on the MX3 board and was wondering what some of you thought about running a staggered set of wheels on a FWD.

    So reason behind it is the wheels I want I can only find in staggered sets. 16x7 +35 and 16x8 +30. looking for thoughts impressions Pro's/Con's. I ran a staggered set on my Rx8 and loved it and had none of the issues that many say that you will have with 50/50 and understeer.

    Thanks for any input.
    Josh
    95' AWD MX-3 RST - Still a work in progress
    05' MS RX-8 - Needing some love in the form of a new motor, soon to be FE3 powered
    Work Log - http://www.wihandyman.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53776
    Cardomain Page - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/408020
    Face Book page http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mazda-...37983472959216

    #2
    Which way are you going to stagger them? The E36 M3s came with a staggered setup (tires and wheels) from the factory and they were much better once you put the same size wheels/tires at all four corners, but things like that are extremely car specific. The reason for having larger tires at one end of the car is because that is where the majority of the weight bias is. On a FWD car the weight bias is going to be toward the front...usually around 60%. Everything else being equal (and it never is) that means you should need more tire on the front to carry the extra load.

    If it's just for looks then do what you want to do, but from a physics standpoint all FWD cars should have more tire on the front than on the back.

    Comment


      #3
      Well originally I was thinking for aesthetics wider in the rear, but for all functional purposes they would need to be up front, so I guess I would throw 5mm spacers in the rear to equal out the wheel base. I plan to hit up a few Auto x events this season and was contemplating running the staggered setup.

      Some say it will increase the understeer but I dont see how it could get worse than it already is. Really the car is set up beautifully the way it is I just really want 16" MS01's.. 15's are a tad small for my liking. I guess it really doesent matter as long as I like it, I just don't want it to look dumb.
      Josh
      95' AWD MX-3 RST - Still a work in progress
      05' MS RX-8 - Needing some love in the form of a new motor, soon to be FE3 powered
      Work Log - http://www.wihandyman.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53776
      Cardomain Page - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/408020
      Face Book page http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mazda-...37983472959216

      Comment


        #4
        you don't want it to look dumb but you were planning on putting wider wheels in the back of a FWD car?

        okay...
        sigpic

        03 Accord DX: K24/5MT, peasant-spec old man's car
        92 240SX: KA/T25, nerd mobile

        Comment


          #5
          I'm going to have to say no on the wider wheels in the back. Looks wise yes it would look good but i think more fingers pointing at you laughing saying "dumb ricer".
          1993 Protege LX-Midnight's shadow SOLD
          1996 Honda CBR600-Wrecked. Damn Honda crippled me
          2002 mazda MPV-family truckster SOLD
          2010 VW routon

          Originally posted by jay
          .....they totally underestimated the number of gearheads such as myself that have families but refuse to grow the hell up and stop playing with cars, or that otherwise see the utility of having 4 doors. Obviously I ain't alone, as there are a helluva lotta sti and evo here. Bueler? Beuler? Mazda? Mazda?

          Comment


            #6
            If your planning on autoX then wider wheels in front would make more sense since the narrow tire in the rear would have less grip giving it more balanced breakaway. Same effect in a way as adding a larger sway bar in back.
            92 Mazda MX3 GS> For sale, $1750 OBO
            94 Escort wagon--BP swap coming, VF10 Turbo, COP, EVO ECU, 03 ZX2 front end conversion
            "Hold yourself accountable before you are held accountable"
            EV14 330cc@3Bar injector kits available.
            EV14 GT500 injector kits available for the BP. 610cc@3Bar.
            EV14 925cc@3Bar injector kits available
            BP Forged H beam rods available now
            KL Forged H beam rods available now
            K8/KF Forged H beam rods awaiting test fit
            FS Forged H beam rods
            awaiting test fit
            F2 Forged H beam rods awaiting test fit
            FE3 Forged H beam rods coming soon
            Mitsubishi 3.8 MIVEC rods coming soon
            Aluminum CAS/Distributor caps
            BP oil jet eliminators
            EV14 fuel rail spacers
            More stuff coming soon.......

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Turpro View Post
              I'm going to have to say no on the wider wheels in the back. Looks wise yes it would look good but i think more fingers pointing at you laughing saying "dumb ricer".
              My thoughts exactly! It would look meaty and have a nice stance if they were in the rear, but I am all about function over looks. for anyone who has seen my AWD car could see that.

              Originally posted by 300zxrb26dett View Post
              If your planning on autoX then wider wheels in front would make more sense since the narrow tire in the rear would have less grip giving it more balanced breakaway. Same effect in a way as adding a larger sway bar in back.
              OK, that makes sense to me. Is it worth it to have wider wheels in front while racing? In my past I have really only ever dragged and tracked my bike.

              If running wider wheels in the front would it make sense to put spacers in the rear to widen the wheel base?
              Josh
              95' AWD MX-3 RST - Still a work in progress
              05' MS RX-8 - Needing some love in the form of a new motor, soon to be FE3 powered
              Work Log - http://www.wihandyman.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53776
              Cardomain Page - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/408020
              Face Book page http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mazda-...37983472959216

              Comment


                #8
                Wheelbase is the distance between the centers of the front and rear wheels. Track is the width between the front two or back two wheels. So spacers would widen the track, not affect wheelbase.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by josh95mx View Post
                  OK, that makes sense to me. Is it worth it to have wider wheels in front while racing? In my past I have really only ever dragged and tracked my bike.

                  If running wider wheels in the front would it make sense to put spacers in the rear to widen the wheel base?
                  Maybe not wider wheels per say due to weight, but one section width wider tire for example on the same wheel. I saw a civic set up for AutoX one time that had 205's on the front and 195's in the rear but the wheels were the same front to back.

                  XelderX should be able to answer your other question about track width since I think he has commented on it in another thread before
                  Last edited by KAinjection; 03-09-2012, 12:31 PM. Reason: track width not wheel base
                  92 Mazda MX3 GS> For sale, $1750 OBO
                  94 Escort wagon--BP swap coming, VF10 Turbo, COP, EVO ECU, 03 ZX2 front end conversion
                  "Hold yourself accountable before you are held accountable"
                  EV14 330cc@3Bar injector kits available.
                  EV14 GT500 injector kits available for the BP. 610cc@3Bar.
                  EV14 925cc@3Bar injector kits available
                  BP Forged H beam rods available now
                  KL Forged H beam rods available now
                  K8/KF Forged H beam rods awaiting test fit
                  FS Forged H beam rods
                  awaiting test fit
                  F2 Forged H beam rods awaiting test fit
                  FE3 Forged H beam rods coming soon
                  Mitsubishi 3.8 MIVEC rods coming soon
                  Aluminum CAS/Distributor caps
                  BP oil jet eliminators
                  EV14 fuel rail spacers
                  More stuff coming soon.......

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'd say go 16x8 at all four corners and be done. In the long term, you will be able to rotate tires front/back to wear them evenly, you'd only need one spare to fit any corner, your car wouldn't look stupid, and you'd be able to resell a set of four wheels a hell of a lot easier than a pair if you ever want to. Plus the suspension/chassis isn't really designed for the differences in handling that staggered wheels will provide, so you'll have to re-design the suspension to counter that change.

                    --sarge

                    Comment


                      #11
                      True,the only real reason I am contemplating it at all is I want a specific MazdaSpeed wheel and I can only really find them in offsets. I guess I could purchase two sets eventually. 16x8 +30 are what I really want. I will have to see what I can come up with. Thanks for all the good feedback guys.
                      Josh
                      95' AWD MX-3 RST - Still a work in progress
                      05' MS RX-8 - Needing some love in the form of a new motor, soon to be FE3 powered
                      Work Log - http://www.wihandyman.com/forum/showthread.php?t=53776
                      Cardomain Page - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/408020
                      Face Book page http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mazda-...37983472959216

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X