A MAP responds just as quickly, maybe even more quickly - we have used an oscilloscope to scope out the signal of a MAP sensor. The response time looks like a vertical jump even when the scope resolution is in the tens of microseconds range. Our unit works great on a MAP setup. (tested on a dyno)
The unit's response and processing time is much quicker than the physical movement of the VAF flap. Furthermore, remember that the rate determining step is the speed of the motor itself. Our unit is able to respond fast enough to change the airflow signal of a v8 engine spinning at 8000 RPM several times between each cylinder fire.
However, that being said, the unit has yet to be tested on a VAF setup. I plan to do this in the next couple of weeks (after I get my wideband O2 kit) and I will post the results. I have just been too busy with the GTX swap to get around to it lately.
The unit's response and processing time is much quicker than the physical movement of the VAF flap. Furthermore, remember that the rate determining step is the speed of the motor itself. Our unit is able to respond fast enough to change the airflow signal of a v8 engine spinning at 8000 RPM several times between each cylinder fire.
However, that being said, the unit has yet to be tested on a VAF setup. I plan to do this in the next couple of weeks (after I get my wideband O2 kit) and I will post the results. I have just been too busy with the GTX swap to get around to it lately.
Comment